Tuesday, September 24, 2019
Part 3: Commentary on Eruvin Shiurim by Rabbi Shraga Kallus
The Shiur 7.1:
The Rebuttal 7.1:
______________________________________
The Shiur 7.2:
The Rebuttal 7.2:
______________________________________
The Shiur 7.3:
The Rebuttal 7.3:
______________________________________
The Shiur 7.4:
The Rebuttal 7.4:
______________________________________
The Shiur 7.5:
The Rebuttal 7.5:
______________________________________
The Shiur 7.6:
The Rebuttal 7.6:
______________________________________
The Shiur 7.7:
The Rebuttal 7.7:
______________________________________
The Shiur 7.8:
The Rebuttal 7.8:
______________________________________
The Shiur 7.9:
The Rebuttal 7.9:
______________________________________
The Shiur 7.10:
The Rebuttal 7.10:
______________________________________
The Shiur 7.11:
The Rebuttal 7.11:
______________________________________
The Shiur 7.12:
The Rebuttal 7.12:
______________________________________
The Shiur 7.13:
The Rebuttal 7.13:
Wednesday, September 18, 2019
Part 2: Commentary on Eruvin Shiurim by Rabbi Shraga Kallus
The Shiur 5.1:
The Rebuttal 5.1:
______________________________________
The Shiur 5.2:
The Rebuttal 5.2:
______________________________________
The Shiur 5.3:
The Rebuttal 5.3:
______________________________________
The Shiur 5.4:
The Rebuttal 5.4:
______________________________________
The Shiur 5.5:
The Rebuttal 5.5:
Friday, September 13, 2019
Part 1: Commentary on Eruvin Shiurim by Rabbi Shraga Kallus
I was asked by some people to
rebut the following shiurim by Rabbi Shraga Kallus, hosted on Torah
Anytime, regarding the inyan of eruvin.
The entire thrust of
these shiurim is to sow doubt in people’s minds regarding city eruvin.
However, what is apparent is that while he may be a marbitz Torah, he
involves himself in issues that he knows little about. It is discernable that
he only really learnt the Mishnah Berurah (and Igros Moshe), and,
therefore, he misses many Rishonim and Achronim.
The fact that he is
currently sitting in Yerushalayim and pontificating about Brooklyn eruvin
demonstrates a deep seated antipathy towards the establishment of these eruvin.
There is no doubt that the main reason he is so obstinate about this issue is
because he already made up his mind that Rav Moshe would be opposed at all
costs, so don’t confuse him with the facts.
I have been told that
he is influencing people with his shiurim; therefore, I took the
initiative to rebut them. I will only rebut those parts of his eruvin shiurim,
5-7, 9-10, that pertain to the issue of reshus harabbim, and about sechirus
reshus. [However, I am sure that if I took the time, I would find many
incorrect statements in all of his shiurim.] I must note, as well, that
these shiurim are full of anecdotes fabricated out of whole cloth and flippant remarks; hence, I will not pull my punches. It is simply
impossible (because of time constraints) to get to all of his shtusim
and bubbe meises, but I will try my best.
The Shiur 6.1:
The Rebuttal 6.1:
______________________________________
The Shiur 6.2:
The Rebuttal 6.2:
______________________________________
The Shiur 6.3:
The Rebuttal 6.3:
______________________________________
The Shiur 6.4:
The Rebuttal 6.4:
______________________________________
The Shiur 6.5:
The Rebuttal 6.5:
______________________________________
The Shiur 6.6:
The Rebuttal 6.6:
______________________________________
The Shiur 6.7:
The Rebuttal 6.7:
______________________________________
The Shiur 6.8:
The Rebuttal 6.8:
______________________________________
The Shiur 6.9:
The Rebuttal 6.9:
______________________________________
The Shiur 6.10:
The Rebuttal 6.10:
______________________________________
The Shiur 6.11:
The Rebuttal 6.11:
______________________________________
The Shiur 6.12:
The Rebuttal 6.12:
______________________________________
The Shiur 6.13:
The Rebuttal 6.13:
______________________________________
The Shiur 6.14:
The Rebuttal 6.14:
______________________________________
The Shiur 6.15:
The Rebuttal 6.15:
______________________________________
The Shiur 6.16:
The Rebuttal 6.16:
______________________________________
The Shiur 6.17:
The Rebuttal 6.17:
______________________________________
The Shiur 6.18:
The Rebuttal 6.18:
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
PART 3: THE TRUTH REGARDING THE STAMFORD HILL ERUV
Their argument: But the Mishnah Berurah argues that most poskim uphold asu rabbim u’mevatlei mechitzta , so according to most poskim the...
-
It seems from the Shulchan Aruch (364:2) that if an area encompassed by walls meets the criteria of a reshus harabbim , it would require, at...
-
Introduction The Jewish Community of St. Louis St. Louis’s Jewish history dates back to at least 1807 when Joseph Philpson, the earliest kno...
-
Continued from part VII Rav Jaffe began his rebuttal, Teshuvah KaHalachah , which he said was an addendum to his Sho’el Ka’inyan and was wr...