Wednesday, May 15, 2024

Part 10: Chukei Chaim: Eruvin Rebuttal

 Chukei Chaim: Issue 321



Chukei Chaim: People Opposed to the Eiruv Who Renounce Their Share

40. In some communities, some people are opposed to making an eiruv. Still, the kinyan on the bread works, as we can assume they don’t mind acquiring it so as not to make carrying assur for others. However, some people try to be clever and announce explicitly they do not want a share in the bread that is transferred to everyone. They think that in doing so, they make the eiruv posul for everyone and succeed in dictating the entire city to follow their opinion. True, at the same time they are causing masses of people to carry where there is no eiruv and commit issurim, but they don’t care about that; their ratzon is the main thing to them, not Hashem’s …

41. However, they are mistaken, even about the halacha. The kinyan does not need to actually give them a share in the bread (26), the proof being that 18 גרוגרות is enough for tens of thousands of people, and not everyone needs a peruta’s worth (38). The bread just needs to be available to everyone such that if they want, they have the right to take some of the eiruv bread (שו"ת עמק התשובה ח''ד סי' כ"א). This is certainly true when it is set up by the city beis din, which has the power of a beis din to be zocheh for everyone (שם). Thus, while these people might be successful in making it assur to carry in and out of their personal houses, they do not interfere with the city eiruv whatsoever (מו"ר בנתיבות שבת פל''א הע' פ''ז, וע''ע שו''ת שואל ומשיב מהדו''ת ח''ב סי' ס''ב, שו''ת בית יצחק יו''ד ח''ב קונט''א סי'ח').

42. Today, we rent property in non-Jewish homes from the city authorities (Issue 320, par. 33). This works even for those who remove themselves from the tzibur and create themselves the status of a non-Jewish home (שו''ת האלף לך שלמה סי' קפ''ב, קצות השלחן סי' ק''ה סי''ד בבה''ש סקכ

Rebuttal: It is impressive that Rav Bleier dismisses those who try to undermine the mitzvah of eruvin, by removing themselves from the shituf. We can add that those establishing an eruv where there are those who do not want to partake in the pas can employ sechiras reshus even for frum Jews. As the power of eminent domain stems from the government’s original ownership of all properties, it is evidence of superseding ownership, which is sufficient even for frum Jews.

The Bais Ephraim Revisited

  As I have written on numerous occasions the argument that the Bais Ephraim maintains that pirtzos esser [breaches of ten amos wide] is ...